Hi Steven,
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 11:27:33 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> [...]
> > Doesn't the traceback tell us exactly where the lambda was called
> > from?
>
> Yes (assuming the source code is available, which it may not be), but
If the source code is not available, then you're
Hi Ethan,
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:00:12 PM UTC-5, Ethan Furman wrote:
> [...]
> __name__ being one of them. One of the reasons lambda
> is not encouraged is because its name is always '', which just
> ain't helpful when the smelly becomes air borne! ;)
Doesn't the traceback tell us e
Hi,
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 3:36:04 PM UTC-5, Devin Jeanpierre
wrote:
> [...]
> Obviously, nobody will be happy until you can do:
>
> def call(*a, **kw): return lambda f: f(*a, **kw)
>
> @call()
> def x, y ():
> yield 1
> yield 2
>
> Actually, maybe not even then.
You're proba
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 9:24:15 PM UTC-5, Yawar Amin wrote:
> [...]
> vals.extend(curr_obj.values())
Ah, I should mention that the above will do a breadth-first search. If
we want to do a depth-first search we simply replace the above line
with:
vals.extendleft(curr_obj.
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 1:34:51 PM UTC-5, Peter Otten wrote:
> [...]
> I recommend that you use a generator:
>
> >>> def walk(obj):
> ... if not hasattr(obj, "keys"):
> ... return
> ... if "things" in obj:
> ... yield obj["things"]
> ... for v in obj.values():
>
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 10:06:34 PM UTC-5, Rick Johnson wrote:
> [...]
> Well i'm not religious in that way, but i can tell you that
> you'd be hard pressed to find a subject that did *NOT*
> annoy someone in this group. Heck, it might even be
> something like finding a "holy grail" if we
Hi,
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-5, Rustom Mody wrote:
> [...]
> Looked at your suggestions...
> And then got distracted by your other project
> https://github.com/yawaramin/vim-cute-python
>
> Reminded me of what I had written some months ago along similar lines
> http://blog
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 1:40:09 AM UTC-5, Ian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> [...]
> > def func(a, b=None):
> > global spam
> > import math
> > spam = [a, b]*3
> > print spam
> > del spam
> >
> > value = [1, "hello", int, func]
>
Hi all,
First off, to each reader--if you believe that 'multi-line' lambdas are
no good and we can just use functions, decorators, &c. to accomplish
everything in Python, advance warning: this post will annoy you.
Now, the crux of my message. I have implemented what I believe is a
fairly robust,