Re: Tiny/small/minimalist Python?

On Jul 2, 6:26 pm, Irmen de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Back in the days my port of Python to the Commodore Amiga machine ran > quite comfortably on a 50 mhz CPU with 4 Mb of RAM. (ok ok it was > Python 1.5.2, that has to be said). > Python started in about 5 seconds on that Amiga if I rememb

Re: Tiny/small/minimalist Python?

On Jul 2, 9:43 am, Paul Rubin <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rtk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > FYI.. I wanted a simple version of Python to run on an ancient DEC > > Alpha box. I got VMS Python 2.5 up and running but it is too slow to > > use. It takes

Re: Tiny/small/minimalist Python?

On Jul 1, 10:12 pm, Paul Rubin wrote: > You've gotten good suggestions about Python configurations. Depending > on your application you might look at alternative languages as well. > Lua and Hedgehog Lisp both come to mind as small embedded interpreters. PyMite will get

Tiny/small/minimalist Python?

I'm looking for information on building a tiny/small/minimalist/ vanilla python interpreter. One that implements the core language and a few of the key modules but isn't tied to any specific operating system. I guess I'm asking for the smallest subset of the standard Python source code files that