bruno at modulix wrote:
> fin = open(path, 'r')
> fout = open(temp, 'w')
> for line in fin:
> if line.strip():
> fout.write(line)
> fin.close()
> fout.close()
>
> then delete path and rename temp, and you're done. And yes, this is
> actually the canonical way to do this !-)
What if there's a
Steve Holden wrote:
> Indeed, but reading one byte at a time is about the slowest way to
> process a file, in Python or any other language, because it fails to
> amortize the overhead cost of function calls over many characters.
>
> Buffering wasn't invented because early programmers had nothing b
I think implementing a finite state automaton would be a good (best?)
solution. I have drawn a FSM for you (try viewing the following in
fixed width font). Just increment the count when you reach state 5.
<---|
||
0 0
Hi All:
Here's a piece of Python code and it's output. The output that Python
shows is not as per my expectation. Hope someone can explain to me this
behaviour:
[code]
class MyClass:
def __init__(self, myarr=[]):
self.myarr = myarr
myobj1 = MyClass()
myobj2 = MyClass()
m
