iday, August 26, 2016 at 1:42:31 AM UTC-7, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 26.08.16 um 09:53 schrieb Erik:
> > On 26/08/16 08:44, mlz wrote:
> >> Here's the key:
> >>
> >> $ python2
> >> Python 2.7.10 ...
> >>>>> 1/2
> >>
ction leak, which is probably
why it has been fixed in python 3.
-= m =-
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 12:54:02 AM UTC-7, Erik wrote:
> On 26/08/16 08:14, mlz wrote:
> >
> > I was being facetious, but behind it is a serious point. Neither the APL
> > nor the J languages u
Aha. That's interesting.
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 2:11:32 AM UTC-7, Peter Otten wrote:
> mlz wrote:
>
> > Yes, I just worked that out. It's the integer math that's the problem.
> >
> > I guess this has been fixed in python 3, but unfortunately
I've been playing with the binomial function, and found that in the below code,
rs *= x does not behave the same way as rs = rs * x. When I set FAIL to True, I
get a different result. Both results are below.
I had read that the two were equivalent. What am I missing?
thanks,
-= miles =-
#!
