Maybe we should welcome zentara instead of try to recreate the perl
experience. Your not a troll either. That is very inappropriate and rather
rude. Welcome to Python enjoy!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-- Forwarded message --
From: matt westerburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 26, 2007 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: I am giving up perl because of assholes on clpm -- switching to
Python
To: zentara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Welcome, the people here are friendly occasional argume
Why are you praising PHP on a python mailing list are you trying to start a
flame war?
(Not evaluating PHP as a language), our company just switched over to using
Django
and my has it saved us time, and we can organize our code its really
beautiful. PHP
is full of new to programming users and thu
I also come from a low level background (assembly and c) and I struggled
with object oriented programming. People talk about procedural languages or
designs and object oriented languages or designs. But after the interpreter
or compiler runs the byte or machine code is procedural always. Object
On 7/13/07, matt westerburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also come from a low level background (assembly and c) and I struggled
with object oriented programming. People talk about procedural languages or
designs and object oriented languages or designs. But after the interpreter
or co
I also come from a low level background (assembly and c) and I struggled
with object oriented programming. People talk about procedural languages or
designs and object oriented languages or designs. But after the interpreter
or compiler runs the byte or machine code is procedural always. Object
From what I understand in order to guarantee
thread safety Python implements an Global Interpreter Lock. Which
removes the concurrency, but provides thread safety. Is Python 2.4
still like this and if I used Python to handle rpc requests and
responses would it be efficient in a multithreaded sense.