On 17 juin, 13:53, méchoui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 17, 9:08 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Yes, I need to make sure my requests are properly written so that the
> > > generic XPath engine does not need
On Jun 17, 11:54 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you know if there is suchXPathengine that can be applied to a DOM-
> > like structure ?
>
> No. But I toyed with the idea to write one :)
>
> > One way would be to take anXPathengine from an existing XML engine
> > (ElementTr
On Jun 17, 10:54 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you know if there is such XPath engine that can be applied to a DOM-
> > like structure ?
>
> No. But I toyed with the idea to write one :)
>
> > One way would be to take an XPath engine from an existing XML engine
> > (Eleme
On Jun 17, 9:08 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I need to make sure my requests are properly written so that the
> > generic XPath engine does not need all the structure in memory.
>
> > There are quite a few cases where you really don't need to load
> > everything at all
On Jun 16, 11:16 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> méchoui schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Problem:
>
> > - You have tree structure (XML-like) that you don't want to create
> > 100% in memory, because it just takes too long (for instance,
Problem:
- You have tree structure (XML-like) that you don't want to create
100% in memory, because it just takes too long (for instance, you need
a http request to request the information from a slow distant site).
- But you want to be able to request data from it, such has "give me
all nodes tha
On May 28, 11:46 pm, Dave Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On May 28, 3:19 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Kind of like how this year's program won't work on next year's
> > > Python?
>
> > For somebody who has admitted to have only very rudimentary knowledge of
> > pyt
On Apr 4, 5:25 pm, John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> > Paul Rubin a écrit :
> >> Brian Vanderburg II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> I've checked out some ways to get this to work. I want to be able to
> >>> add a new function to an instance of an object.
>
> >
