"Mike Driscoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jan 15, 2:20 pm, "Erik Lind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That all looks cool. I will experiment more. I'm a bit slow on this as
>> only
>> two weeks old
That all looks cool. I will experiment more. I'm a bit slow on this as only
two weeks old so far.
Thanks for the patience
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> def HandleSomething(self, event):
>generating_control = event.GetEventObject()
>print generating_control
>
> HTH,
Thank you.That is what I was looking for, but as often seems the case, one
thing exposes another. Is there any way to listen for events without
specifically binding to a ha
I'd appreciate any pointer on a simple way to tell within an event handler
where the event came from.
I want to have "while" condition in a handler to stop or change processing
if an event occurs from some other button click.
Trying to bind more than one event to the same handler still doesn't t
I see a more complicated thread on a similar sounding question, but my
question is simpler, I hope.
I have a large numpy matrix, initially created as:
Mat = zeros((a,b), int)
and a smaller array with other data
Sub = [1,2,3,4,5],[6,7,8,9,0]
I want to replace a section of Mat matrix with Sub m
I'm new to Python, and OOP. I've read most of Mark Lutz's book and more
online and can write simple modules, but I still don't get when __init__
needs to be used as opposed to creating a class instance by assignment. For
some strange reason the literature seems to take this for granted. I'd
app
I wish something like this was part of the standard python installation,
and didn't require one to use Numpy or Numarray. This sort of list
subsetting is useful in many, many contexts.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
One difficulty I am having with using Python for scientific computing is
that I cannot figure out good ways to get arbitrary (unpatterned?) slices.
As an example, in R or Matlab / Octave, syntax exists such that:
vals = range(6)
wanted = [1,2,3,1,1,1]
vals[wanted] = [1,2,3,1,1,1]
Both of those
Yes, and Du Buisson's and a variety of others. Liked spiders and spent
time at the WNNR?
lind wrote:
> I am looking for an old friend, used to work at a path lab in Pretoria,
> dabbled in Scientology and rock climbing? I know this is not
> friendster.com, but I really have to ge
I am looking for an old friend, used to work at a path lab in Pretoria,
dabbled in Scientology and rock climbing? I know this is not
friendster.com, but I really have to get into contact with him.
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote:
>
>
> | Hi,
> | I need help about Tkinter lis
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I'm not what "build statically" means; if you talking about
> building a statically linked interpreter binary - then no,
> this is not possible. At a minimum, you need to link with -ldl,
> or else you cannot perform dlopen(3).
I'll be more specific: when I build python 2.3.
Is there any way to build the python executable statically and
still be able to load modules built as shared libraries?
I'm trying to run python scripts on a stripped down FreeBSD (4.9)
machine which has no shared system libraries so I want to link it
statically against libc et al, but it would be
12 matches
Mail list logo
