Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> OK - Here's some reasoning that may illuminate it. We could, in
theory,
> reduce any language to the minimal Boehm & Jacopini control
structures
> (iirc there were only four). In effect, anything beyond these is
> syntactic sugar. IOW, feel free to use a minimalist Turing M
Maxim Kasimov wrote:
> > Maxim Kasimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>WOW, just greate! ... but i'd like to relax at some more
> >>interesting way than to comment each of rows
> but what if i just can't to do this becouse i'm working thrue ssh,
and have to
> use only installed editors (such as vi)
