e Python objects.
>
> 3) Invokes a function of said C extension for further
> processing. This step needs as much memory as possible.
>
> I'd like step 2 to return memory to the C allocator so that it
> is available to the extension in step 3 (which uses malloc).
>
>
e.
>
> I'd like step 2 to return memory to the C allocator so that it
> is available to the extension in step 3 (which uses malloc).
>
> Regards,
> Iker Arizmendi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I happen to have the code for the C library in question, but I don't
think this is the way to go in general. If there's a way to get Python
to give memory back to the C allocator I can avoid touching the
library at all.
Regards,
Iker
John Machin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I can, but t
I can, but the extension is only a thin wrapper around a general
purpose C library which is also used independently of Python.
Iker
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> Can you modify the C source? If you can, use the Python memory
> allocation functions PyMem_Malloc/PyMem_Realloc/PyMem_Free.
>
>
>
> Gabr
.
Regards,
Iker Arizmendi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks for the reply Giovanni. Is this behaviour of the close method on
Windows documented anywhere?
Regards,
Iker
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On UNIX one can use popen* to get a pipe for reading, a pipe for
writing, and the exit code of the child process via a call to close()
on the last pipe. Is there any way, in principle, to simulate such
behaviour on Windows? Some googling reveals that direct use of the
popen* functions on Windows wi
unc(rself->obj, args);
printf("post call\n");
rself->realfunc = 0;
return rv;
}
The problem here is that this doesn't work for static functions which
lack a self argument, or for module level functions.
Is there a better way?
Thanks,
Iker Arizmendi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ever, this fails on Windows as it doesn't have the fromfd
function. Aren't WinSock handles inherited by default? And if
so, is there some other way to perform a listen()/accept() in
this case?
Regards,
Iker Arizmendi
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
