Joe Marshall wrote:
{...}
> The issue of `static vs. dynamic types' comes up about twice a year in
> comp.lang.lisp It generally gets pretty heated, but eventually people
> come to understand what the other person is saying (or they get bored
> and drop out of the conversation - I'm not sure whic
Torben Ægidius Mogensen wrote:
> There are several aspects relevant to this issue, some of which are:
> - Compactness: How much do I have to type to do what I want?
..
> - Naturality: How much effort does it take to convert the concepts of
>my problem into the concepts of the language?
