Re: RUBY vs COMMON LISP

2009-08-03 Thread fft1976
On Aug 3, 8:02 pm, Carl Banks wrote: > On Aug 3, 7:51 pm, fft1976 wrote: > > > > > On Aug 3, 1:19 am, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) > > wrote: > > > > fft1976 writes: > > > > By the way, here is in 1 line of BF, a complete BF rea

Re: RUBY vs COMMON LISP

2009-08-03 Thread fft1976
On Aug 3, 1:19 am, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) wrote: > fft1976 writes: > > By the way, here is in 1 line of BF, a complete BF reader that is able > > to > > read all the BF syntax needed to write it: > > > ,+[-.,+] > > > Here's ho

Re: If Scheme is so good why MIT drops it?

2009-07-19 Thread fft1976
On Jul 19, 9:55 am, Frank Buss wrote: > E.g. the number system: In many Lisp > implementations (/ 2 3) results in the fractional object 2/3. In Python 2.6 > "2 / 3" results in "0". Looks like with Python 3.1 they have fixed it, now > it returns "0.66", which will result in lots of fun for