Georg Brandl wrote:
> enigmadude wrote:
> > As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
> > through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
> > document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
> > 735293857239475
As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
735293857239475 will cause CPython to hang, whereas IronPython will
raise a ValueError. Trying this on m
If what you're trying to do is have more control over the type of
object that is instantiated, then you could use a function that decides
what class to use based upon the arguments supplied to the function,
where it then instantiates an object from the chosen class, then
returns the object. The __i
sort function. Geez. Just keep the sources open people.
Slawomir Nowaczyk wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 17:35:27 -0700
> enigmadude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> #> 2. I've never done this, but you might be able to encrypt or otherwise
> #> turn you modules into binary
I don't think you're the first person that has wondered about this. But
you might have some options:
1. If you are running it on Windows only, use py2exe to wrap it up as
an executable.
2. I've never done this, but you might be able to encrypt or otherwise
turn you modules into binary form, and th
I agree with the previous comments that this approach is "bad form".
But if you absolutely *must* modify an enclosing function's variables
with an inner function, all you need to do is remember that a Python
function is an object too, so it can be assigned attributes. ;-)
def outer():
outer.x
There's several ways of doing concurrency in Python. Other than the
threading module, have you tried FibraNet? It's designed with simple
games in mind.
You can download it at http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/FibraNet.
Specifically the nanothreads module from FibraNet uses generators to
simulate li
That's a vague question, so the obligatory "it depends" response
applies here.
If you want to guard against the unexpected, perhaps it's a good idea
to write unit tests rather than to take someone's word that it *should*
work okay every time, in every case, no matter what you're doing with
the dat
This syntax works on other bzipped tar files. But it's not unheard of
that large tarballs will get corrupted from a download mirror. Use a
download manager and try redownloading the file. Usually a mirror will
include an md5sum text file so that you can compare the checksum to
your downloaded file
