Re: Removal of tkinter from python 3.0? [was: Fate of the repr module in Py3.0]

2008-03-20 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 20, 2:39 am, "Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to > remove tkinter from the python core? PEP 3108 starts off with: I really like Python since I started using it a couple years ago, but this is a huge turnoff an

Re: SOAP Server in Python

2008-03-19 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 19, 9:19 am, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am basically looking to do the same thing in Python as easily. > > Any help or pointers would be appreciated. Googling for "python soap" turned up a few hits that may help you. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Python and 3D

2008-03-16 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 15, 3:09 pm, Eric von Horst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for Python modules that allow you to manipulate 3D > objects, more specifically Alias Wavefront .OBJ objects. > Also, a module that would allow you to vizualize these models and > rotate them etc.. > > The goal is

Re: Distributed App - C++ with Python for Portability?

2008-03-11 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 11, 3:03 am, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in 337600 20080310 222850 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >On Mar 10, 2:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app > >> needs a gui. > > >The promise of Java po

Re: Distributed App - C++ with Python for Portability?

2008-03-10 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 10, 2:21 pm, Bob Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Java is more portable than most other languages, especially if your app needs > a gui. The promise of Java portability was one of the biggest scams ever perpetrated on the software industry. There are issues going from OS to OS, VM t

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-08 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 8, 5:14 pm, "K Viltersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /** Projects an object from 3D to 2D using > the method of Alexander The Great. > \param 3D structure to be projected > \returns 2D projection > */ > public Proj2D get2Dfrom3D(Proj3D param); > > The above is, to me, very cl

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-08 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 8, 2:27 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Good comments are better than bad names. > Good names are better than bad comments. If you're taking the time to write good comments, why not just fix the bad names? The compiler/interpreter can never, ever catch bad comments. -- http://mail.python

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-08 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 8, 1:31 pm, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: LOL. Thanks for the laughs. I share your frustration. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-08 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 8, 2:38 am, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cybersource.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:57:32 -0800, dave_mikesell wrote: > >> x = get_stuff(store) # Get the stuff what was brought at the store. > > > Perfect example of an unnecessary com

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-07 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 7, 10:38 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cybersource.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:04:47 -0800, dave_mikesell wrote: > > On Mar 7, 10:31 am, "K Viltersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've been recommended reading >

Re: Regarding coding style

2008-03-07 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 7, 10:31 am, "K Viltersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been recommended reading of:http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ > and in there i saw two things that i > need to get elaborated. > > 1. When writing English, Strunk and > White apply. If your code needs so much descriptive p

Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a1 and 3.0a3

2008-03-03 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 1, 10:53 pm, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Mrz., 19:51, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Python 2.6 is not only the next advancement in the Python 2 series, it > > is also a transitionary release, helping developers begin to prepare > > their code for Python 3.0

Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a1 and 3.0a3

2008-03-03 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 1, 10:53 pm, Kay Schluehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1 Mrz., 19:51, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Python 2.6 is not only the next advancement in the Python 2 series, it > > is also a transitionary release, helping developers begin to prepare > > their code for Python 3.0

Re: Run Python app at startup

2008-03-02 Thread dave_mikesell
On Mar 2, 3:37 pm, "SMALLp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hy. > I create simple application. Yust an windows and "compile" it with > py2exe. I add registry value > reg add HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run /v > MyApp /t REG_SZ /d C:\myapp.exe /f' > > And it wont start

Re: Python app at startup!

2008-02-29 Thread dave_mikesell
On Feb 29, 7:21 am, SMALLp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Does it do the same thing when you run it with the Python interpreter? > > No. The programm works fine! In interupter and when i "compile" it. My guess is that you're not including something in the .exe that yo

Re: Python app at startup!

2008-02-29 Thread dave_mikesell
On Feb 28, 5:07 pm, "SMALLp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hy. I create simple application. Yust an windows and "compile" it with > py2exe. I add registry value > reg add HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run /v > MyApp /t REG_SZ /d C:\myapp.exe /f' > > And it wont start.

Re: Article of interest: Python pros/cons for the enterprise

2008-02-28 Thread dave_mikesell
Good article. Re: the comparisons with C++, most of my experience is with C++ and I like it because it's powerful, flexible, portable, and keeps me employable. However, I can't think of any application or system I've written in C++ (or Java or Perl) that could not have been written in Python. In