WOW...I am thinking that all of this was actually unnecessary, I don't think I
need a Queue, or List / Stack, or any traversal of the file system to
accomplish this!!
I only need one image displayed at a time and don't care about them after a
newer image is generated. So my prototype of just re
Here is my code in PasteBin...
http://pastebin.com/ZubyV8RT
If you go to the very bottom of the paste, you will see the error messages that
I get, but here it is again.
---
Warning (from warnings module):
File "C:\Users\rucinskic
> Who/what are you responding to here? You haven't included any context
> from what you're replying to.
Sorry, never really used Google Groups, or anything like this before. That I
was responding to only Chris Angelico with his question of how real-time it
needed to be...since it takes some ti
Real-time...as close to real-time as possible. That is why I did not really
want to use a queue. That is because if a bunch of the thread that create the
images finish really close to one another (when they should be spread out based
on how the music is played), then there would be a larger "lag
Hello,
I have been using Python for a few months now, so I am still learning a few
things here and there.
Basically I am creating a program that will stream musical notes into a program
called Lilypond one-by-one and it will create the sheet music for that stream
of music via OS command. Your
