> Another suggestion is to ensure that the job specification is not
> overly simplified. How did you parse the text into "words" in the
> prior exercise that produced the list of bigrams? Won't you need to
> use the same parsing method in the current exercise of tagging the
> bigrams with an under
I have a list of strings. These strings are previously selected
bigrams with underscores between them ('and_the', 'nothing_given', and
so on). I need to write a regex that will read another text string
that this list was derived from and replace selections in this text
string with those from my l
