ly I was using the open menu of Python Launcher to open my
files. And now it works fine.
Usually I use to run python scripts from BBEdit itself and this is now
working as expected.
What a great place to find answers! Thanks again.
Charly
http://cf29.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
nt to run py file either with Python
Launcher.app or directly from BBEdit (the text editor i use). I get
the "cannot execute binary file" error.
In /usr/local/bin/ the python symbolic link is connected to Python v3
Charly http://cf29.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Greetings,
On Mac OS 10.5.6, I updated Python to version 3.0.1.
When I want to run a py file, I get an error:
xxx:~ xxx$ cd '/Users/xxx/Documents/programmingPractice/' && '/usr/
local/bin/python' '/Users/xxx/Documents/programmingPractice/
python_file.py' && echo Exit status: $? && exit 1
-bash: /
Thank you Jean, I could fix this problem. Creating the symbolic link
wasn't really obvious though.
They also say about the documentation:
*Extract the documentation files, and place them in some suitable
location, e.g.
~/Library/Python-Docs
*Edit your "environment.plist" file, and create an enviro
I installed Python 2.5 on my Mac (OS X Tiger). When running scripts
with the TextWrangler Run command it is using the system installed
version of Python (2.3). If I run the scripts with the Apple Terminal
it uses the new version (2.5).
Is there any way to ask TextWrangler to use the new version of
Which website would you recommend for a great documentation about
Python?
I am looking for a list of methods and properties of all the Python
elements with syntax examples.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 23, 2:04 pm, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> def combinations(seq, n):
> if n == 0:
> yield []
> else:
> for i in xrange(len(seq)):
> for cc in combinations(seq[i+1:], n-1):
> yield [seq[i]]+cc
>
> >>> for c
To make it simple and not have to deal with the 8 queens problem that
is different with the 5 queens one, I'll ask in a different way.
I am not familiar with implementing in Python such terms as "standard
depth-first search of the solution space", "permutation", "recursion",
"'canonical' form", ..
Sorry again I forgot a part of the function in my previous post:
---
# add nbQueens (5) new queens on safe squares
def newQueens(nbQueens=5):
solution = [] # one solution
for i in range(len(board)): # 64 squares
On Dec 23, 1:49 am, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How did you find 184 solutions? Wolfram says there are 91 distinct
> > > solutions for 5-queens on an 8x8 board with no two queens attacking
> > > each other.
>
> It's *91* distinct solutions to what appears to be *exactly* your
> pro
On Dec 23, 12:39 am, Jervis Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2:36 pm, cf29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The goal is to control all the chess board with five queens that do
> > not attack each other. I found "manually" many solutions to this
On Dec 22, 11:05 pm, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only 5? The classic algorithm is 8-queens on a standard 8x8 board,
> as I recall...
This is a different problem. You have to control all the squares with
only 5 queens.
In the 8 queens problem you have to put 8 "safe queen
Greetings,
I designed in JavaScript a small program on my website called 5
queens.
(http://www.cf29.com/design/dame5_eng.php)
The goal is to control all the chess board with five queens that do
not attack each other. I found "manually" many solutions to this
problem (184 until now) and wanted to
13 matches
Mail list logo
