On Nov 12, 10:52 pm, "John O'Hagan" wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:47:26 +, John O'Hagan wrote:
> > > I have a generator function which takes as arguments another generator
> > > and a dictionary of other generators like this:
>
> > > def modgen
On Oct 23, 7:29 am, Roger Davis wrote:
> Are there any Python debuggers with a decent GUI out there at all that
> will work on a Mac with the following features: (i) ability to pass in
> a sys.srgv[] list that the program would otherwise see without the
> debugger, (ii) display local variables,
On Nov 10, 10:02 am, Mel wrote:
> xoff wrote:
> > I was wondering what the best method was in Python programming for 2
> > discontinued ranges. e.g. I want to use the range 3 to 7 and 17 to 23.
> > Am I obliged to use 2 for loops defining the 2 ranges like this:
>
> > for i in range (3,7):
> > do
On Nov 1, 1:58 am, iwawi wrote:
> On 1 marras, 09:59, "cbr...@cbrownsystems.com"
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > On Oct 31, 11:46 pm, iwawi wrote:
>
> > > On 31 loka, 21:48, Tim Chase wrote:
>
> > > > > PRJ01001 4 00100END
> > > > &g
On Oct 31, 11:46 pm, iwawi wrote:
> On 31 loka, 21:48, Tim Chase wrote:
>
>
>
> > > PRJ01001 4 00100END
> > > PRJ01002 3 00110END
>
> > > I would like to pick only some columns to a new file and put them to a
> > > certain places (to match previous data) - definition file (def.csv)
> > > could be
On Oct 31, 4:27 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message
> <687bcb76-0093-4d68-ba56-0390a3e1e...@30g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>
> cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
> > I should note that efficiency is not an issue to me here; this is for
> > when you have,
On Oct 31, 12:48 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> > PRJ01001 4 00100END
> > PRJ01002 3 00110END
>
> > I would like to pick only some columns to a new file and put them to a
> > certain places (to match previous data) - definition file (def.csv)
> > could be something like this:
>
> > VARIABLE FIELDSTARTS
On Oct 29, 2:43 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:16:42 -0700, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
> > It's clear but tedious to write:
>
> > if 'monday" in days_off or "tuesday" in days_off:
> > doSomething
>
>
On Oct 28, 11:56 am, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> "cbr...@cbrownsystems.com" writes:
> > It's clear but tedious to write:
>
> > if 'monday" in days_off or "tuesday" in days_off:
> > doSomething
>
> > I currently am tend
On Oct 28, 10:05 am, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > On Oct 28, 9:23 am, John Posner wrote:
> >> On 10/28/2010 12:16 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
>
> >> > It's clear but
On Oct 28, 9:23 am, John Posner wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 12:16 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
>
> > It's clear but tedious to write:
>
> > if 'monday" in days_off or "tuesday" in days_off:
> > doSomething
>
> > I currently am t
It's clear but tedious to write:
if 'monday" in days_off or "tuesday" in days_off:
doSomething
I currently am tending to write:
if any([d for d in ['monday', 'tuesday'] if d in days_off]):
doSomething
Is there a better pythonic idiom for this situation?
Cheers - Chas
--
http://mail.p
On Sep 22, 3:39 pm, Baba wrote:
> On Sep 22, 9:18 pm, Baba wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 22, 3:38 pm, nn wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 21, 6:39 pm, Baba wrote:
>
> > > > Hi
>
> > > > query level: beginner
>
> > > > as part of a learning exercise i have written code that:
>
> > wordlist = ['hello', 'bye']
On Aug 18, 11:50 am, John Posner wrote:
> On 8/18/2010 1:38 PM, cbr...@cbrownsystems.com wrote:
>
> >>> To go the other way, if d = 1, then there exists integers (not
> >>> neccessarily positive) such that
>
> >>> a*x + b*y + c*z = 1
>
> That
On Aug 18, 10:52 am, Baba wrote:
> Hi Chas
>
> Thanks for that and i agree on your last remark :)
>
> re the number of required consecutive passes required:
>
> The number of required consecutive passes is equal to the smallest
> number because after that you can get any amount of nuggets by just
On Aug 17, 2:44 pm, Baba wrote:
> On Aug 16, 6:28 pm, "cbr...@cbrownsystems.com"
>
> wrote:
> > First, suppose d = gcd(x, y, z); then for some x', y', z' we have that
> > x = d*x', y = d*y', z = d*z'; and so for any a, b, c:
>
&g
On Aug 16, 11:04 am, Baba wrote:
> Hi Chas, Roald,
>
> These are all complicated formula that i believe are not expected at
> this level. If you look at the source (see my first submission) you
> will see that this exercise is only the second in a series called
> "Introduction to Programming". The
On Aug 16, 1:23 am, Roald de Vries wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Baba wrote:
> >> Hi Mel,
>
> >> indeed i thought of generalising the theorem as follows:
> >> If it is possible to buy n, n+1,…, n+(x-1) sets of McNuggets, for
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
