Re: Python (was Re: Recent history of vi)

2025-12-19 Thread candycanearter07
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote at 02:05 this Sunday (GMT): > On 13 Dec 2025 11:55:35 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >> Everything else is just a lot of lies. They pretend it's not strongly >> typed, but in the real world you will only encounter a lot of issue if >> you believe that. > > Think about

Re: in Python: (101 102 103 201 202 203 301 302 303 401 402 403 )

2024-06-14 Thread candycanearter07 via Python-list
Phil Carmody wrote at 12:01 this Thursday (GMT): > Paul Rubin writes: >> HenHanna writes: >>> is there another (simple) way to write this? >> >> Yes, but please consider doing these easy exercises yourself instead of >> fobbing them onto other people. > > Hen's probably just an experimental GPT.