On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:08:15 -0800, Scott David Daniels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zak Arntson wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:48:30 -0800, Scott David Daniels
> Most likely so. Possibly an equal amount of has work -- hash of a pair
> is a function of hashes of the lelem
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:48:30 -0800, Scott David Daniels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zak Arntson wrote:
> > My current approach is that in the Frame class, I have a method to
> > call _after_ initialization that creates a bunch of dummy methods so
> > the user does
tate_methods()
return self
b = Frame()
b.init()
myList.append(b)
###
Phew! Hope that's not overly long! Now I can't be the first person to
want a pre- and post- child init code! I'm worried that I'm
overlooking something or there's an even more Pythonic way to do
things than above.
--
Zak Arntson
http://www.harlekin-maus.com - Games - Lots of 'em
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list