2009/7/13 Aaron Scott :
>> BTW, you should derive all your classes from something. If nothing
>> else, use object.
>> class textfile(object):
>
> Just out of curiousity... why is that? I've been coding in Python for
> a long time, and I never derive my base classes. What's the advantage
> to der
2009/7/13 seldan24 :
> Thank you both for your input. I want to make sure I get started on
> the right track. For this particular script, I should have included
> that I would take the exception contents, and pass those to the
> logging module. For this particular script, all exceptions are fata
2009/7/12 Cameron Pulsford :
> My question is, is it possible to combine those two loops? The primes
> generator I wrote finds all primes up to n, except for 2, 3 and 5, so I must
> check those explicitly. Is there anyway to concatenate the hard coded list
> of [2,3,5] and the generator I wrote so
2009/7/8 Dhananjay :
> I wanted to sort column 2 in assending order and I read whole file in array
> "data" and did the following:
>
> data.sort(key = lambda fields:(fields[2]))
>
> I have sorted column 2, however I want to count the numbers in the column 2.
> i.e. I want to know, for example, how
2009/7/6 Xavier Ho :
> Why is version B of the code faster than version A? (Only three lines
> different)
Here's a guess:
As the number you're testing gets larger, version A is creating very
big list. I'm not sure exactly how much overhead each list entry has
in python, but I guess it's at least
2009/7/4 Steven D'Aprano :
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 13:42:06 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 10:55:44 +0100, Vilya Harvey wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/7/4 Andre Engels :
>>>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:33 AM, mclovin wrote:
>>&
2009/7/4 Patrick Sabin :
> If someone has another idea of taking a snapshot let me know. Using VMWare
> is not a
> very elegant way in my opinion.
Someone implemented the same idea for Java a while ago. They called it
"omniscient debugging"; you can find details at
http://www.lambdacs.com/debu
2009/7/4 Andre Engels :
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 9:33 AM, mclovin wrote:
>> Currently I need to find the most common elements in thousands of
>> arrays within one large array (arround 2 million instances with ~70k
>> unique elements)
>>
>> so I set up a dictionary to handle the counting so when I a