On 12/13/2009 08:32 AM, anand jeyahar wrote:
> A crucial element in this hypothetical module would be the main graph
> data structure. The simplest approach would be to implement it in pure
> python, with lists, dicts and such, as many libraries do. However, this
> would rule out it
On 12/10/2009 01:57 PM, Bearophile wrote:
> Geremy Condra:
>> Well, we all seem to have reinvented the wheel differently ;)
>
> Maybe also because they are designed for different purposes.
This is true. For instance, the data structures and most algorithms in
graph-tool are implemented in C++ to
Hi there,
On 12/11/2009 08:12 AM, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> I really like the API of networkx but have no problem in switching to
> another one (right now) I have the impression that graph-tool might
> be faster and have a smaller memory footprint than networkx, but am
> unsure about that.
I
On 12/08/2009 01:27 PM, Robin Becker wrote:
> I don't want to sound pessimistic, but graph and digraph theory has a
> lot of history, especially in computer science. There are already very
> many implementations eg
>
> http://code.google.com/p/igraph
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/libs/gr
