Re: The Modernization of Emacs

2007-06-17 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
For the love of dogs, Xah, try to keep up. Aquamacs is an Emacs distribution that, which not there yet, is at least half way between "classic" Emacs and a modern Mac UI. You sound ridiculous, like if you were complaining about Windows not being really graphical, based on experience with Windows-3

Re: The Concepts and Confusions of Prefix, Infix, Postfix and Fully Functional Notations

2007-06-12 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
On Jun 11, 11:36 pm, Tim Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 11, 8:02 am, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 11, 2:42 am, Joachim Durchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It is possible to write maintainable Perl. > > > Interesting (spoken in the tone of someone hearing ab

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-11 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David C. Ullrich wrote: > > > But duh, if that's how things are then we can't have transitive > > dependencies working out right; surely we > > want to be able to have B depend on A and then C > > depend on B... > > (And also if A and B are allowed to depen

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-08 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, you do not want on-change handlers propagating data to other > slots, though that is a sound albeit primitive way of improving > self-consistency of data in big apps. The productivity win with > VisiCalc was that one simply writes rules that use other c

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-08 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Alex Martelli wrote: > > Steve R. Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >... > > > > But the key in the whole thread is simply that indentation will not > > > > scale. Nor will Python. > > > > > > This is a curious statement, given that Python is famous for scaling

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-07 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As for: > > > At a syntax-sugar > > level, for example, Lisp's choice to use parentheses as delimiter means > > it's undesirable, even unfeasible, to use the single character '(' as an > > ordinary identifier in a future release of the language. > > (def

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-06 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
[ I pruned the cross-posting down to a reasonable level ] Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas F. Burdick wrote: > > > This is second-hand, as I don't actually follow Python closely, but > > from what I've heard, they now have reasonable scoping ru

Re: A critic of Guido's blog on Python's lambda

2006-05-06 Thread Thomas F. Burdick
Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hopefully it can be a big issue and still not justify a flame war. > > Mileages will always vary, but one reason for lambda is precisely not > to have to stop, go make a new function for this one very specific > use, come back and use it as the one lambda