Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl a écrit :
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> what is nicer about each?
>>> Yes.
>>
>> And
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> what is nicer about each?
>
> Yes.
And No.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (and the "stable release" and "much will change" stuff is pure FUD, of
> course. what competing project will I find if I google your name?)
Found something? Maybe this could help me to choose a web
framework.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*-
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:11 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>>
>>>> Django isn't ready.
>>>
&g
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>
>> Django isn't ready.
>
> That's a remarkably ignorant statement.
The 1.0 release will be in September.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.
Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango
June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
abeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would want to know which could be the best programming language for
> developing web spider.
Since you ask in comp.lang.python: I'd suggest APL
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Don't let the subject line fool you. I'm OK with cStringIO. The
>> thread is now about xml.sax's parseString().
>
> Giving you the benefit of the doubt here, despite the fact that St
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just checked on a system without PyXML: xml/sax/__init__.py
>> defines parseString() and uses cStringIO (when available).
>>
>> Python 2.5.1
>>
>
>
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> But the style of the answers makes me wonder if I should report
>> the bug in xml.sax (or its documentation) or just ignore it.
>
> Note that PyXML is no longer actively maintained, so it's unlike
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/26/07, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
>> > to work with XML, then gen
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:47:48 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote:
>
>> Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
>>> to wo
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte
>>> encoded string. Read the XML spec.
>>
>> Pointers, ple
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want
> to work with XML, then generate well-formed XML in the correct
> encoding. There's no reason you should have an XML document (as
> opposed to values extracted from that document) in unic
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte
> encoded string. Read the XML spec.
Pointers, please.
Last time I read that part of the spec was when a customer's
consulting company switched to ISO-8859-15 without saying
someth
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>>> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>>>>> Well
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>>>> Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing
>>>> the fact, that I can't use Un
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing
>> the fact, that I can't use Unicode with parseString().
>>
>> This parseString() uses cStringIO.
>
> Well, Python un
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Scholl wrote:
>> After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing
>> (PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one:
>>
>> $ python2.5
>> Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35
After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing
(PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one:
$ python2.5
Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35:53)
[GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for
In comp.lang.lisp sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an
> efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with
You are not allowed to publish .NET benchmarks. :-)
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (
Nicholas Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize that in this context it is used for removing a specific key
> from the current dictionary object. But why call it pop and not
> something more intuitive like remove or delete?
I wasn't a python programmer back than, but I'd guess it's
be
Boris Ozegovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Umm, can somebody tell me which language is this one:
>No polls are available.
English?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
JustStand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In many ways, it was the launch of Windows 95 and Office 95 eleven
> years ago that signaled the start of this transformation. ..."
Right. 11 years ago I switched from Amiga to Linux.
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/
In comp.lang.lisp Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/index.html
>>
>> Careful there with the sweeping generalizations and quick judgments
>> about languages :)
>
> I just read "PHP as a language is rath
25 matches
Mail list logo