Re: zope vs openACS

2008-11-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl a écrit : >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> what is nicer about each? >>> Yes. >> >> And

Re: zope vs openACS

2008-11-21 Thread Stefan Scholl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 1:50 am, gavino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> what is nicer about each? > > Yes. And No. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Amazon: "Practical Django Projects" by James Bennett (June 2008)

2008-07-19 Thread Stefan Scholl
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (and the "stable release" and "much will change" stuff is pure FUD, of > course. what competing project will I find if I google your name?) Found something? Maybe this could help me to choose a web framework. -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*-

Re: Amazon: "Practical Django Projects" by James Bennett (June 2008)

2008-07-17 Thread Stefan Scholl
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:41:11 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Stefan Scholl wrote: >>> >>>> Django isn't ready. >>> &g

Re: Amazon: "Practical Django Projects" by James Bennett (June 2008)

2008-07-16 Thread Stefan Scholl
Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: > >> Django isn't ready. > > That's a remarkably ignorant statement. The 1.0 release will be in September. -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/ -- http://mail.

Re: Amazon: "Practical Django Projects" by James Bennett (June 2008)

2008-07-16 Thread Stefan Scholl
Dave U. Random <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://snipr.com/PracticalDjango June 2008 is a bit too early. Django isn't ready. -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: developing web spider

2008-04-02 Thread Stefan Scholl
abeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would want to know which could be the best programming language for > developing web spider. Since you ask in comp.lang.python: I'd suggest APL -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-28 Thread Stefan Scholl
Michael L Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Don't let the subject line fool you. I'm OK with cStringIO. The >> thread is now about xml.sax's parseString(). > > Giving you the benefit of the doubt here, despite the fact that St

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-28 Thread Stefan Scholl
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/28/07, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just checked on a system without PyXML: xml/sax/__init__.py >> defines parseString() and uses cStringIO (when available). >> >> Python 2.5.1 >> > >

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-28 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> But the style of the answers makes me wonder if I should report >> the bug in xml.sax (or its documentation) or just ignore it. > > Note that PyXML is no longer actively maintained, so it's unlike

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-28 Thread Stefan Scholl
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/26/07, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want >> > to work with XML, then gen

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-27 Thread Stefan Scholl
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:47:48 +0200, Stefan Scholl wrote: > >> Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want >>> to wo

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-27 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte >>> encoded string. Read the XML spec. >> >> Pointers, ple

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Chris Mellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > XML is not a string. It's a specific type of bytestream. If you want > to work with XML, then generate well-formed XML in the correct > encoding. There's no reason you should have an XML document (as > opposed to values extracted from that document) in unic

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The XML is *not* well-formed if you pass Python unicode instead of a byte > encoded string. Read the XML spec. Pointers, please. Last time I read that part of the spec was when a customer's consulting company switched to ISO-8859-15 without saying someth

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Stefan Scholl wrote: >>>> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Stefan Scholl wrote: >>>>>> Well

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Stefan Scholl wrote: >>>> Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing >>>> the fact, that I can't use Un

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> Well, http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html is missing >> the fact, that I can't use Unicode with parseString(). >> >> This parseString() uses cStringIO. > > Well, Python un

Re: Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan Scholl wrote: >> After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing >> (PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one: >> >> $ python2.5 >> Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35

Any reason why cStringIO in 2.5 behaves different from 2.4?

2007-07-26 Thread Stefan Scholl
After an hour searching for a potential bug in XML parsing (PyXML), after updating from 2.4 to 2.5, I found this one: $ python2.5 Python 2.5 (release25-maint, Dec 9 2006, 14:35:53) [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-20)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for

Re: Microsoft's Dynamic Languages Runtime (DLR)

2007-05-03 Thread Stefan Scholl
In comp.lang.lisp sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an > efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with You are not allowed to publish .NET benchmarks. :-) -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (

Re: pop method question

2007-03-03 Thread Stefan Scholl
Nicholas Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I realize that in this context it is used for removing a specific key > from the current dictionary object. But why call it pop and not > something more intuitive like remove or delete? I wasn't a python programmer back than, but I'd guess it's be

Re: Django, one more newbie question

2007-02-19 Thread Stefan Scholl
Boris Ozegovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Umm, can somebody tell me which language is this one: >No polls are available. English? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: A mail from Steve Ballmer. See what Microsoft will do and follow.

2006-12-03 Thread Stefan Scholl
JustStand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In many ways, it was the launch of Windows 95 and Office 95 eleven > years ago that signaled the start of this transformation. ..." Right. 11 years ago I switched from Amiga to Linux. -- Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/

Re: Computer Language Popularity Trend

2006-09-27 Thread Stefan Scholl
In comp.lang.lisp Jon Ribbens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> http://xahlee.org/lang_traf/index.html >> >> Careful there with the sweeping generalizations and quick judgments >> about languages :) > > I just read "PHP as a language is rath