on this matter though, it's
just my understanding. You can be fairly confident that the GPL is iron
clad though, it would have been dragged through every court in the land
by now if it wasn't.
I've also followed the LGPL/GPL library debate, and while I have
opinions on that
oes so more strongly than mere
social convention does. There are after all several members of community
that needs this reminder; notably children. It's emphatically not to
keep thieves out (much) as they won't be much hampered by the ordinary lock.
If you don't want
t in *my* software and
release the whole under the GPL. As if that was somehow 'unfair'. Look,
(and I'm obviously not saying this to the parent poster as he never
expressed any such sentiment, I'm just venting) that's what *you* wanted
when you released the code under that license. If you don't want me to
do that, then don't use those licenses, mkay.
Stefan,
--
Stefan Axelsson (email at http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~sax)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
would outweigh the cost.
Then again I'm seriously considering going back to Haskell, so I guess
I'm at least a little biased. :-) :-)
Stefan,
--
Stefan Axelsson (email at http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~sax)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
st actual use (or words
to that effect) would 'slow them down', or be very onerous.
Stefan,
--
Stefan Axelsson (email at http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~sax)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
