Re: "Strong typing vs. strong testing"

2010-09-29 Thread Squeamizh
On Sep 29, 3:14 pm, RG wrote: > In article > <07f75df3-778d-4e3d-8aa0-fbd4bd108...@k22g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > >  Squeamizh wrote: > > On Sep 29, 3:02 pm, RG wrote: > > > In article > > > <996bd4e6-37ff-4a55-8db5-6e7574fbd...

Re: "Strong typing vs. strong testing"

2010-09-29 Thread Squeamizh
On Sep 29, 3:02 pm, RG wrote: > In article > <996bd4e6-37ff-4a55-8db5-6e7574fbd...@k22g2000prb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > >  Squeamizh wrote: > > On Sep 27, 10:46 am, namekuseijin wrote: > > > On 27 set, 05:46, TheFlyingDutchman wrote: > >

Re: "Strong typing vs. strong testing"

2010-09-29 Thread Squeamizh
On Sep 27, 10:46 am, namekuseijin wrote: > On 27 set, 05:46, TheFlyingDutchman wrote: > > > > > > > On Sep 27, 12:58 am, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) > > wrote: > > > RG writes: > > > > In article > > > > <7df0eb06-9be1-4c9c-8057-e9fdb7f0b...@q16g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > >