Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> I'm not what "build statically" means; if you talking about
> building a statically linked interpreter binary - then no,
> this is not possible. At a minimum, you need to link with -ldl,
> or else you cannot perform dlopen(3).
I'll be more specific: when I build python 2.3.
Is there any way to build the python executable statically and
still be able to load modules built as shared libraries?
I'm trying to run python scripts on a stripped down FreeBSD (4.9)
machine which has no shared system libraries so I want to link it
statically against libc et al, but it would be
