Re: Cheat sheet

2008-01-01 Thread Riccardo T.
Riccardo T. ha scritto: > I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of > my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback > Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please? > > http://greyfox.imente.org/

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-29 Thread Riccardo T.
ZeD ha scritto: > Michele Simionato wrote: > >> Python 2.4.4 (#2, Oct 4 2007, 22:02:31) > file is open >> True >> >> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Oct 5 2007, 13:36:32) > file is open >> False >> >> Nowadays file is no more an alias for open. > > curious... maybe it's me, but I can't find a

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-29 Thread Riccardo T.
Scott David Daniels ha scritto: > Riccardo T. wrote: >> Maybe I'll add __builtin__ and os in place of the type hierarchy, but >> I'm not sure about that. However, not in the next release. What do you >> think about? > > How about: > top line w/ _

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-29 Thread Riccardo T.
Alaric ha scritto: > Nicely done! I would suggest you put your website address on it and a revision > number so that as it gains use on te web, people can find the "latest" > version. That's a good idea, thank you :) -- GreyFox -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-28 Thread Riccardo T.
Scott David Daniels ha scritto: > Riccardo T. wrote: >> Scott David Daniels ha scritto: >>> [in the .png] >>>> ... >>>> Callable types >>>>... >>>>User-definet methods >>> I personally prefer "User-defined

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-28 Thread Riccardo T.
c james ha scritto: > On the svg version, as viewed on firefox, the sections "Simple > statements", "Definations" and "Comments"; there appears to be a problem > with text wrapping. I see, it has already been signaled by mail. I'm not sure about how to fix that, I'll have to ask someone who knows

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-28 Thread Riccardo T.
Scott David Daniels ha scritto: > [in the .png] >> ... >> Callable types >>... >>User-definet methods > > I personally prefer "User-defined methods" That's a typo, thank you. >>... >>Class instances > I'd try: > Class instances with a __call__ method. Yes, it's more clear

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-27 Thread Riccardo T.
Carl Banks ha scritto: > On Dec 27, 12:38 pm, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of >> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback >> Could you have a loo

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-27 Thread Riccardo T.
Markus Gritsch ha scritto: > On Dec 27, 11:38 am, "Riccardo T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of >> my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback >> Could you have a loo

Re: Cheat sheet

2007-12-27 Thread Riccardo T.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: > Looks cool, but you might find these interesting too: > > http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/pointal/python/pqrc/ > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-June/386662.html > > Mike Thanks :) I'll read them to improve my python knowledge, but I prefere to have

Cheat sheet

2007-12-27 Thread Riccardo T.
I wrote a little cheat sheet for this wonderful language, but because of my still little experience with it, I would like to have a feedback Could you have a look at it and tell me what do you think about, please? http://greyfox.imente.org/index.php?id=73 -- GreyFox -- http://mail.python.org/mai