Pete Bartonly wrote:
>
> Quick question, probably quite a simple matter. Take the follow start of
> a method:
>
>
> def review(filesNeedingReview):
>
> for item in filesNeedingReview:
> (tightestOwner, logMsg) = item
>
> if (logMsg != No
Peter Otten wrote:
> Pete Bartonly wrote:
>
>> Quick question, probably quite a simple matter. Take the follow start of
>> a method:
>>
>>
>> def review(filesNeedingReview):
>>
>> for item in filesNeedingReview:
>> (tightestO
A.T.Hofkamp wrote:
> On 2007-10-25, Pete Bartonly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Quick question, probably quite a simple matter. Take the follow start of
>> a method:
> With respect to compactness and style, you can move your multi-assignment
> statement in the for loop
A.T.Hofkamp wrote:
> On 2007-10-25, Pete Bartonly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Quick question, probably quite a simple matter. Take the follow start of
>> a method:
>>
>>
>> def review(filesNeedingReview):
>>
>> for item in filesNeedin
Quick question, probably quite a simple matter. Take the follow start of
a method:
def review(filesNeedingReview):
for item in filesNeedingReview:
(tightestOwner, logMsg) = item
if (logMsg != None):
for logInfo in logMsg.changed_paths:
This generates the
