I'm afraid I don't have a Windows machine to test on, but..
Ransom wrote:
> I get an error like:
> [ 0x15450880>]
>
This isn't an error. This is a list with one element, where the element
apparently represents a range of Excel cells. So by using that element
you can do things like changing the fo
Erik Johnson wrote:
> Maybe I just don't know the right special function, but what I am wanting to
> do is write something akin to a __getattr__ function so that when you try to
> call an object method that doesn't exist, it get's intercepted *along with
> it's argument*, in the same manner as __ge
Duncan Booth wrote:
> Heikki Salo wrote:
>
> >
> > And closer look tells that the code should not even compile. Is the
> > code cut & pasted directly? Line "list[i] = item;" tries to assign a
> > pointer to an int-array, which should not compile. There are other
> > similar oddities.
>
> ... such a
Dr. Pastor wrote:
> Any reply?
>
ahem. three replies, when i counted:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/ab0c8455251e616c/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Sybren Stuvel wrote:
> Dr. Pastor enlightened us with:
> > When I select Run Module in the Edit window, I got only
> > two >>> after the RESTART line.
> > I expected to see the output of several commands!
>
> You never gave it any commands that print output.
>
> I suggest reading the Python tutoria
mrstephengross wrote:
> I would like to distribute a python program, but only in .pyc form (so
> that people cannot simply look at my code). Is there a way to do this?
> I've read up a little on the logic by which python creates .pyc's, and
> it sounds like python requires the main executed program
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have been reading many of the posting on the GIL and impact on
> threading etc.
> I have found is confusing and would welcome some clarity on this.
>
> I understand that embedding the interpreter in a C/C++ application
> limits it to one CPU.
> If the application is mul
David Duerrenmatt wrote:
> Hi there
>
> For some reasons, I've to use Python 1.5.2 and am looking for a workaround:
>
> In newer Python versions, I can call a function this way:
>
> func = some_function
> func(*params)
>
I think the "apply" function is what you want:
apply(object[, args[, kwargs]
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> A small hint about the Web-site:
> At least to me, the links to the documentation as e.g.
>
> http://pysizer.8325.org/doc/auto/home/nick/sizer-trunk/doc/auto/scanner.html
> are broken (no big thing, because the distro has it anyway).
>
Oops. That should be fixed now.
--
I'd like to announce the first release of PySizer, a memory usage
profiler for Python code.
PySizer was written as part of Google's Summer of Code.
The source, documentation and so on are at http://pysizer.8325.org.
The current release is at
http://pysizer.8325.org/dist/sizer-0.1.tar.gz.
The code
10 matches
Mail list logo
