Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> [...]
> (coerce (lschar :name "LATIN") 'string)
> --> "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
> ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóô
> [...]
In what programming language/interpreter is this code?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Xah Lee wrote:
> Languages with Full Unicode Support
>
> As far as i know, Java and JavaScript are languages with full, complete
> unicode support. That is, they allow names to be defined using unicode.
> (the JavaScript engine used by FireFox support this)
>
> As far as i know, here's few other
Xah Lee wrote:
> Thanks to the great many people who has written to my ISP in support of
> me. I'm sorry to say, it looks like they will be killing my account
> anyhow. [...]
I'm sorry to see you go for now Xah, but I'll be doubly happy to see
your return :)
Dreamhost isn't the only hosting compa
David Squire wrote:
> Max M wrote:
>> John Bokma wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Your first question should be: Is it alright that Xah harasses 5
>>> newsgroups? Or maybe work on your spelling, harass is with one r, but
>>> maybe you didn't read the subject, which wouldn't amaze me, si
Max M wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Your first question should be: Is it alright that Xah harasses 5
>> newsgroups? Or maybe work on your spelling, harass is with one r, but
>> maybe you didn't read the subject, which wouldn't amaze me, since you
>> sound like you
Robert Sedlacek wrote:
> In comp.lang.perl.misc Mitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
>> All that I snipped is your opinion, which is yours to do with as you
>> please. "I like it just the way it is." is *MY* opinion, so please
>> don't try to change it. I think I know my opinion best.
>
> Wrong.
Mitch wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
> [...]
>> You're mistaken. All you need to do is report it. After some time Xah
>> will either walk in line with the rest of the world, or has found
>> somewhere else to yell. As long as it's not my back garden and not
>> around 4AM, I am ok with it.
>>
>
> Wal
SamFeltus wrote:
> I was considering opening an account with Dreamhost. Can't say I agree
> with all of Xah's writings, but they often raise important points.
> Dreamhost is a company I will never spend money with. Usenet is full
> of narrow minded group thinking that needs to be questioned.
>
Xah Lee wrote:
> I'm sorry to trouble everyone. But as you might know, due to my
> controversial writings and style, recently John Bokma lobbied people to
> complaint to my web hosting provider. After exchanging a few emails, my
> web hosting provider sent me a 30-day account cancellation notice la
Xah Lee wrote:
> the following are 2 FAQ following this thread. Thanks.
>
> Addendum: 2006-05-15
>
> Q: What you mean by embeding tab position info into the source code?
> How's that gonna be done?
>
> A: Tech geekers may not realize, but such embedding of meta info do
> exist in many technologi
Xah Lee wrote:
> Software Needs Philosophers
>
> by Steve Yegge, 2006-04-15.
>
> Software needs philosophers.
>
> [...]
>
> This post is archived at:
> http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/04/software-needs-philosophers.html
>
> and
> http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/_p/software_phil.
M Jared Finder wrote:
> SamFeltus wrote:
>> [...]
>> Software needs philosophers is an interesting point, perhaps the most
>> important function of Philosophers is exposing Sacred Cows as just
>> Cattle.
>
> Finally, someone else who sees that Xah's posts consistently expose
> valid problems! (T
Xah Lee wrote:
> Tabs versus Spaces in Source Code
>
> Xah Lee, 2006-05-13
>
> In coding a computer program, there's often the choices of tabs or
> spaces for code indentation. There is a large amount of confusion about
> which is better. It has become what's known as “religious war” —
> a heated
13 matches
Mail list logo
