bugbear wrote:
> Er. How about
>
> public class test {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> String a = "a string";
> String b = "another one";
> StringBuffer c = a + b;
String c (etc.), that is.
> System.out.println(c);
> }
> }
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Timofei Shatrov wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:48:05 GMT, "Mike Schilling"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tried to confuse everyone with this
> message:
>
>> Xah Lee wrote:
>>
>>> So, a simple code like this in normal languages:
>
>>> becom
Xah Lee wrote:
> So, a simple code like this in normal languages:
>
> a = "a string";
> b = "another one";
> c = join(a,b);
> print c;
>
> or in lisp style
>
> (set a "a string")
> (set b "another one")
> (set c (join a b))
> (print c)
>
> becomes in Java:
>
> public class test {
> public static
"Erik Max Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>
>> If I were to write, say, that Tony Blair's tax policy will lead to higher
>> deficits, I could be convicted of libel? Even if that's true,
"Philippa Cowderoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Mike Schilling wrote:
>
>> I'm not aware of any definition of libel that includes "making statements
>> that are not provably true".
>>
"Mallor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I know I'm coming late to the barbeque. In passing, I ask: do you have
> an objective, impartial perspective on the subject of committing
> crimes? Because libel is a crime. It all depends on whether what you
> state abou
"P.L.Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I agree. I have already written to Dreamhost and I hope more people
> will do so. I have found some of what has been posted here quite
> astonishing and the actions of certain people to be reprehensible: by
> far the most
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Chris Uppal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [apologies to the whole flaming crowd for sending this to the whole
>> flaming crowd...]
>>
>> Geoffrey Summerhayes wrote:
>>
>>> After you kill Navarth, will it be nothing but
"Xah Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>What is Expressiveness in a Computer Language
>Xah Lee, 200502, 200603.
>In languages human or computer, there's a notion of expressiveness.
>English for example, is very expressive in manifestation, witness all
>the poetry
"Roedy Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 17 Mar 2006 00:58:55 -0800, "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>
>>Hmmm... it displays fine via google groups. Maybe it's the reader which
>>is 'non-compliant' ?
> I
"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>
>> "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>There is no different to Microsoft bewe
"David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>There is no different to Microsoft beween a bare computer and one
> preloaded with Linux or FreeBSD. One can quickly be converted to other
> with minimal cost of effort. In the market, bare PCs really do compete
"Steven D'Aprano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:17:14 +, axel wrote:
>
>> Employees have *no* obligations towards the shareholders of a company.
>> They are not employed or paid by the shareholders, they are employed
>> by the company its
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One alternative, as I've said, is to write to the standards, and then
> work around bugs in the popular browsers. If the public whim changes
> which browser is most popular -
I am not holding my breath.
> it only has min
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Now, once more, why are standards" *more valuable* than
>> "recommendations"?
>
> standards are
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Mike Schillin
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Roedy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 18 Oct 2005 06:57:47 GMT, John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> or quoted :
>>
>That an HTML standard (ISO/IEC 15445:2000) and an HTML
>recommendation by w3c (4.01 f
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> [ w3c "standard" v.s. I
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Mike Schilli
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Roedy
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What matters in generating HTML is which browsers you want to support and
>> what they understand. Standards and recommendat
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> &q
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Roedy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 16 Oct 2005 05:22:47 GMT, John Bokma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>> or quoted :
>>
>>>No, it's a recommendation, an advise, nothing else. Otherwise they
>>>would call it a stand
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>> Yup, b
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
>>> No, it's a recommendation, an advise
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>&
"John Bokma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Which standards? W3C doesn't make standards (they talk about working
> drafts and recommendations), so nothing to warp there for MS.
Umm, a recommendation *is* a standard.
And Microsoft must disagree with you. When the
"Denis Kasak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>>
>> I see a difference between "X would be useful for A, B, and C" and "Y
>> will always be the only proper way."
>>
>> Don&
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "Rich Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Mike Schilling wr
"Rich Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Mike Schilling wrote:
>
>> Another advantage is that evewry internet-enabled computer today already
>> comes with an HTML renderer (AKA browser), so that a message
"CBFalconer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mike Schilling wrote:
>> "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> "l v&
"Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Mike Schilling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "l v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Xah Lee wrote:
>>
"l v" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Xah Lee wrote:
>> (circa 1996), and email should be text only (anti-MIME, circa 1995),
>
> I think e-mail should be text only. I have both my email and news readers
> set to display in plain text only. It prevents the marketee
"Jürgen Exner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Xah Lee wrote:
>> Jargons of Info Tech industry
>>
>> (A Love of Jargons)
>>
>> Xah Lee, 2002 Feb
>>
>> People in the computing field like to spur the use of spurious
>> jargons. The less educated they are, the more they
35 matches
Mail list logo
