* at ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Sorry for breaking into this thread, but I agree completely that any
> unnecessary indentations should be avoided. For the same reason I advocate
> that the following syntax should work:
>
> for x in some_list if some_condition:
> ... code
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello:
> I have next dictionaries:
> a={'a':0, 'b':1, 'c':2, 'd':3}
> b={'a':0, 'c':1, 'd':2, 'e':3}
> I want to put in a new dictionary named c all the keys that are in b
> and re-sequence the values. The result I want is:
> c={'a':0, 'c':1, 'd':2}
* Bob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'd like to setup command line switches that are dependent on other
> switches, similar to what rpm does listed below. From the grammar below
> we see that the "query-options" are dependent on the query switch,
> {-q|--query}. Can "optparse" do this or do I have t
* Brendan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
> Is there a simpler way to check that either all arguments are scalars,
> or all are lists of the same length? Is this a poor way to structure
> things? Your advice is appreciated
Disclaimer: I am new to python, so this may be a bad solution.
import t
