ChrisA -
>> I wasn't really asking "is multiprocessing appropriate?" but whether
>> there was a cleaner way to subclass multiprocessing.BaseManager() to
>> use a subclass of Process(). I can believe the answer is No, but
>> thought I'd ask.
>
> I've never subclassed BaseManager like this. It m
On Monday, March 24, 2014 7:19:56 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Matt Newville
>
> > I'm maintaining a python interface to a C library for a distributed
> > control system (EPICS, sort of a SCADA system) that does a large
> > amou
I'm maintaining a python interface to a C library for a distributed
control system (EPICS, sort of a SCADA system) that does a large
amount of relatively light-weight network I/O. In order to keep many
connections open and responsive, and to provide a simple interface,
the python library keeps a
his works by maintaining an internal namespace (a flat dictionary), and
walking the AST generated for the expression. It supports most Python syntax,
including if, for, while, and try/except blocks, and function definitions, and
with the notable exceptions of eval, exec, class, lambda, yield, and i
specific code building the control is at
https://github.com/newville/wxmplot/blob/master/lib/imageframe.py
Hope that helps,
--Matt Newville
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, January 5, 2013 8:17:16 AM UTC-8, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 5 January 2013 16:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Oscar Benjamin
>
> > wrote:
>
> >> On 4 January 2013 15:53, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> >>> On 2013-01-04, Steven D'Aprano
> >>> wrote:
>
responding (in windows cmd).
>
> I'm not sure what is wrong so if anyone as any ideas I would gladly
> send you the netcdf file to try. Thanks.
If the file is really of NetCDF3 format, scipy.io.netcdf should work.
Replace
netCDF4.Dataset(filename,'r',format='NETCDF3_CLASSIC')
with
scipy.io.netcdf.netcdf_open(filename,'r')
--Matt Newville
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 17, 7:25 pm, Jive Dadson wrote:
> I just found another module that broke when I went to 2.6. > Gnuplot.
> Apparently one of its routines has a parameter
> named "with." That used to be okay, and now it's not.
This was fixed in version 1.8 of Gnuplot.py
> Once I get everything to work u
> Do others think like me here?
Yes!! I agree completely: Wax is not only a fantastic idea, but a very
good start at an implementation of that idea.
--Matt Newville
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> To my eyes, that's less readable than, and has no benefit over, the
> following:
>
> def foo(thing):
> if thing:
> result = thing+1
> else:
> result = -1
> return result
I wouldn't discount:
def foo(thing):
result = -1
if thing:
10 matches
Mail list logo
