On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:18 AM, slamdunk wrote:
> is there a way for a function to understand whether it's being run
> through a OnCreate callback or not?
> I have working functions that I want to recycle through the OnCreate
> but need to catch the "nuke.thisNode()" bit inside them so they can
>
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 4:05 PM, kj wrote:
> I'm will be teaching a programming class to novices, and I've run
> into a clear conflict between two of the principles I'd like to
> teach: code clarity vs. code reuse. I'd love your opinion about
> it.
In general, code clarity is more important than r
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
>> You can certainly have a string type that uses byte arrays in UTF-8
>> encoding internally, but your string functions should be aware of that
>> and treat it as a unicode string. The len function and index operators
>> should count characters, not bytes.
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Andreas Rumpf wrote:
> Dear Python-users,
>
> I invented a new programming language called "Nimrod" that combines Python's
> readability with C's performance. Please check it out:
> http://force7.de/nimrod/
> Any feedback is appreciated.
Nice with a language with
e results are useful.
Martin
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:50 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-10-26 13:54, Martin Vilcans wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm wondering if there's a tool that can analyze a Python program
>> while it runs, an
Hi list,
I'm wondering if there's a tool that can analyze a Python program
while it runs, and generate a database with the types of arguments and
return values for each function. In a way it is like a profiler, that
instead of measuring how often functions are called and how long time
it takes, it
On Jan 20, 2008 8:58 PM, Martin Marcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are you saying that when i have 2 gmail addresses
>
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> they are actually treated the same? That is plain wrong and would break a
> lot of mail addresses as I have 2 that follow just
On 1/7/08, Guilherme Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/1/7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Anything written somewhere that's thorough? Any code body that should
> > serve as a reference?
>
> PEP 8
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/
The problem with PEP 8 is that even code
On Nov 10, 2007 12:48 AM, Rhamphoryncus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 1:45 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. If micro-locked Python ran, say, half as fast, then you can have a lot
> > of IPC (interprocess communition) overhead and still be faster with
> > multiple process
On Nov 9, 2007 10:37 AM, Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Martin Vilcans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> If by 'this' you mean the global interpreter lock, yes, there are good
> >> technical reasons. All attempts so far
> If by 'this' you mean the global interpreter lock, yes, there are good
> technical reasons. All attempts so far to remove it have resulted in an
> interpeter that is substantially slower on a single processor.
Is there any good technical reason that CPython doesn't use the GIL on
single CPU sys
es SciPy, Scientific,
Numeric and NumericArray and the relations between them.
Any suggestions on what library I should use?
Best regards,
Martin Vilcans
http://www.librador.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
12 matches
Mail list logo
