On 2, Nov, 2012, at 06:24 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Martin Hewitson writes:
>> Well, here we disagree. Suppose I have a class which encapsulates
>> time-series data. Below is a list of the absolute minimum methods one
>> would have to process that data. ...
>> &
>
>
> BTW: If you told us which language(s) you have a background in, it could be
> easier to help you with identifying the idioms in that language that turn
> into misconceptions when applied to Python.
I'm considering porting some MATLAB code to python to move away from commercial
software
On 2, Nov, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt
wrote:
> Am 02.11.2012 09:20, schrieb Martin Hewitson:
>> Well, here we disagree. Suppose I have a class which encapsulates
>> time-series data. Below is a list of the absolute minimum methods one
>> would have
On 2, Nov, 2012, at 09:40 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 08:08, Martin Hewitson wrote:
>>
>> Even if one takes reasonable numbers: 20 methods, each method has 20 lines
>> of documentation, then we immediately have 400 lines in the file before
>> writi
On 2, Nov, 2012, at 09:00 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Martin Hewitson wrote:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I'm relatively new to Python and have googled and googled but haven't
>> found a reasonable answer to this question, so I thought
On 2, Nov, 2012, at 08:38 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Martin Hewitson writes:
>> So, is there a way to put these methods in their own files and have
>> them 'included' in the class somehow? ... Is there an official python
>> way to do this? I don't like hav
Dear list,
I'm relatively new to Python and have googled and googled but haven't found a
reasonable answer to this question, so I thought I'd ask it here.
I'm beginning a large Python project which contains many packages, modules and
classes. The organisation of those is clear to me.
Now, the