> Does the "EMCenter" really need to /subclass/ from all of those? Or
> would it be better to make some of those attributes of an EMCenter
> INSTANCE (passing in instances of the others to the __init__() ).
>
> class EMCenter(object):
> def __init__(self, b, r, c, ol):
>
Hi, thanks for your answer, too :)
Your solution won't do it, because of reasons I explained
in the answer to Georg Brandl.
> BTW, care to tell us what the connections mean? Applications of
> connected instances of the one class are of course very common, but 50
> classes connected in a cyclic fa
Thanks for the answer.
> You could move all connections to a central location after the
> class definitions, such as
>
> class A: pass
> class B: pass
> class C: pass
>
> connections = {A: (B, C), B: (C,), C: (A,)}
I think I simplified my classes a bit too much :)
Actually there are multiple typ
Thanks for your answer :)
> You could use a function:
>
> class A(object):
>@staticmethod
>def connected_to(): return [B, C]
>
I already thought about such a solution, but since
my code has to be compatible with python 2.3, i would
have to use the connected_to = staticmethod(connected
Hello list,
I have searched for some time now, but no result...
I'm having the following problem:
In a module I have a huge number of classes of the form:
class A(object):
connected_to = [B, C]
class B(object)
connected_to = [C]
class C(object)
connected_to = [A]
As you s
