Justin T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What these seemingly unrelated thoughts come down to is a perfect
> opportunity to become THE next generation language.
Too late: <http://www.erlang.org/>
:)
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jan Theodore Galkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments? Suggestions?
<http://www.ruby-lang.org>
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
'libwx' in libs:
print d
findLinkedWithWX('/Applications')
findLinkedWithWX('/Developer')
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
No it's not, because you insist on presenting only one part of the
problem. Using native widgets is *far* from enough.
> Such self-important pronouncements would be better received if you
> brought them down the mountain on stone tablets.
No problem, let me get my chisel, do you prefer Fe
m toolkits/frameworks
are so great and automagically allow to produce superlickable and
native-looking/feeling applications on all three major platforms, why is
there so few of those applications on OS X ?
"Because Mac users are elitists assholes" is not the good answer by the
way :)
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Apple Mac", so
the rephrasing does not apply in this case. So here's a last try:
"Crossplatform toolkits/frameworks suck. All of them. No exception.
ESPECIALLY if one of your target is Mac OS".
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
platform, abstract the
core of your application and embed it in platform native GUI code.
--
Luc Heinrich
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
