On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
...
>
> I think it depends how often people need to implement such boiler-plate
> code for themselves. Now I see that this thread is not very popular, so
> indeed maybe you are right... Though it'd be nice to have OOTB such
> a factory in `coll
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Steven
D'Aprano wrote:
...
>
>> The old discussion, the above link points to, shows that such a
>> dot-accessible dict-like class is something that many people need and
>> repeatedly implemet it (more or less perfectly) for themselves.
>
> I think it's something whic
I like this version very much. I'm ready to put this into practice to see
how it
works in practice.
A minor point: I envision this to be used in a context where all key values
are
strings (legal attribute identifiers). But constructing an AttrClass from a
dict
or setting values directly with the
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Steven D'Aprano <
st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:46:01 -0700, Ken Newton wrote:
>
> > I have created the following class definition with the idea of making a
> > clean syntax for non-programme
5
print atr
print
print repr(atr)
print
print atr.fourth.aaa
=
test() gives the following output:
{
second : 2
fifth : 5
fourth : {
aaa : AAA
bbb : BBB}
third : three
first : 1}
AttrClass({'second': 2, 'fifth': 5, 'fourth': AttrClass({'aaa': 'AAA',
'bbb': 'BBB'}), 'third': 'three', 'first': 1})
AAA
Ken Newton
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
