On Aug 21, 5:11 pm, John McGaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Reviews of latest models of best guitars, fender, gibson, yamaha, and
> > many more, with pictures and prices.
>
> Are these new guitars made of SPAM like your message and your "blog"?
That'd be bloody terribl
On Aug 20, 8:54 pm, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the message then
> says something absurd, like "this is a newsgroup about Python" when
> I'm reading it in cljp, well, what do you expect? :P
I think most would expect you to go, "WTF?" but then, like a rational
person, click the helpful
On Jun 22, 1:09 pm, Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe they lost the business plan. It's not surprising, since it
> was probably written on a napkin.
Or perhaps they HAD a bunch of good cleaning tips, but accidentally
threw them out while cleaning?
Tip: don't throw stuff out unless y
On Jun 21, 4:31 pm, Falcolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your statement holds true if, and only if, a user does not take full
> advantage of the keyboard commands. But if we're talking about
> experienced users in both cases, then that's not an issue, is it?
Granted. I suppose my claim should hav
> I don't think anyone can make the argument that any (past or current)
> graphics-based editor is as efficient when being used to its fullest
> as a text-based editor.
Clarifying - this part of the claim assumes a fairly similar feature
set, naturally.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
Feel free to disagree with what I'm about to say. I know that this
thread would be far, FAR shorter if OP hadn't been instigating
disagreement, but so far most of the discourse has been polite, so I'm
going to say what I'm thinking.
I think there are far too many people in all camps (the Emacs cam
On Jun 20, 4:49 pm, Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 20, 4:35 pm, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Twisted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On the other hand, being actively beginner-hostile leads to nobody
> > > adopting the tool. Then again, if you don't mind being the l
On Jun 20, 9:28 am, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kaldrenon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm very, very new to emacs. I used it a little this past year in
> > college, but I didn't try at all to delve into its features. I'm
> > starti
Just so everyone's clear:
Nothing he has said makes much sense, if any.
He's talking about advocacy of something unique and powerful by -
making it less unique and powerful-. Not merely catering to the lowest
common denominator, but promoting something as better -by making it
worse-. Who does tha
