Michael Terry wrote:
>
>Folks admire Newton for some of his breathtaking insights, not because
>of his methods. The scientific method is a tool.
As was Newton, according to many of his contemporaries.
> The results are far more important than the tool.
Yep.
Jim
--
"I loathe people who say, '
wesley chun wrote:
>my book, Core Python Programming, is revised to 2.5, but focuses on
>teaching you the core part of the language, features, objects, memory
>management, development, good practices, some advanced topic coverage,
>and presents lots of exercises. however, it is not an exhaustive
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
>En Sat, 10 Feb 2007 03:57:05 -0300, Jim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> int routine() {
>> Py_Initialize();
>> ...
>> }
>
>(Why routine() and not main()? Unfortunately you can't repeteadly
>initialize/fi
Jim Hill (that'd be me) wrote:
I forgot one more key thing: the compiled code is being run via mpirun
(LAM/MPI). Might that have something to do with my pain and heartache?
Jim
(original post reproduced below in shocking breach of etiquette on the
off chance someone's interested in
Well, I've found about a hundred thousand web pages where people have
had the same problem I have but nary a page with a solution that works
for me.
I want to do a simple embed, so I've followed the example in the
Extending and Embedding documentation:
In the .c file,
#include
int routine() {
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>Jim Hill wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to write a script that writes a script for a rather specialized
>> task. I know that seems weird, but the original version was written in
>> Korn shell and most of my team are familiar with the way it does things
&
John Roth wrote:
[Here docs]
>I'm not sure why you'd want to do this, though.
>It seems like it would be mostly useful in a style
>of programming that's quite foreign to the way
>Python wants to be programmed.
I'm going to try some of the suggestions that others have floated but I
think you've re
Keith Dart wrote:
>Jim Hill wrote:
>> Is there a way to produce a very long multiline string of output with
>> variables' values inserted without having to resort to this wacky
>
>I was thinking about this. But I can't think of any reason why you would
>want
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>Scott David Daniels wrote:
>
>> And if you enjoy building insecure stuff, try:
>>
>> def fix(text, globals_=None, locals=None, quote='"'):
>> d = (globals_ or locals or globals()).copy()
>> source = text.split(quote)
>> source[1::2] = (str(eval(expr
Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
>Jim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a way to produce a very long multiline string of output with
>> variables' values inserted without having to resort to this wacky
>> """v = %s"""%(var
I've done some Googling around on this and it seems like creating a here
document is a bit tricky with Python. Trivial via triple-quoted strings
if there's no need for variable interpolation but requiring a long, long
formatted arglist via (%s,%s,%s,ad infinitum) if there is. So my
question is:
11 matches
Mail list logo
