On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:25:54PM -0700, Joe Snodgrass wrote:
> For larger images of the notes go here. [LINK]
[LINK] ???
--
FA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:06:20AM +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Asking for *real-world* uses is just how the python community smothers
> requests.
It's quite a common strategy, I've seen it used in many
contexts. Which doesn't make it any more acceptable of
course.
> Should someone come with
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 08:12:22PM -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The irony of this is that memoizing 'recursive' functions with a
> decorator depends on the fact the Python does not have truly recursive
> functions. A function cannot call itself directly.
I wonder what exactly is meant by that
Hello all,
I wonder if someone could explain some of the following.
(Python 3.2)
I have a class which has a method called 'callback()'.
An instance of this class calls a C extension which
then calls back into Python.
In all cases below, two arguments are passed to the C
code and end up in
PyO
Hello all,
Upgrading to 3.2 has provided some sort of cold shower.
I have hundreds of extensions that fail to install due to
PyCObject_FromVoidPtr() and PyCObject_AsVoidPtr() not longer
being available, and I'm looking for a (hopefully) simple
solution.
In all cases, these are extensions that cr
