ts what done before by psyco:
http://psyco.sourceforge.net/
No need for a decorator though.
--
Florian Ludwig
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>>
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
def foo():
"""Some ütf-8 docstring ∑ g⊙f (x)"""
return False
<<>> help(test)
Help on module test:
NAME
test - # -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
FILE
/tmp/test.py
FUNCTIONS
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 19:20 +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Am 15.02.10 23:12, schrieb Florian Ludwig:
> > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:47 +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> >>> Here there problem with the trac (and other plugin systems I've
> >> seen)
> >&g
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 16:14 +0100, Paul Kölle wrote:
> Am 15.02.2010 23:12, schrieb Florian Ludwig:
> > On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:47 +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> And then of course, this is not really needed. In Python, behavior
> >> counts,
or some input as well and posted some days back
about a similar topic. Maybe some of the thoughts expressed there might
help you as well:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/0a210267753919b0/5add7bc93789b418
Florian
--
Florian Ludwig
signature.asc
Descriptio
ttp://dpaste.com/hold/159634/
Now putting both together:
> import pbus
>
> import wiki
> import auth_openid
> # or: import auth_shibboleth
>
> pbus.get("wiki").run()
No interface definitions.
What do you think? Any obvious pitfalls (besides reinventing somethi
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 10:16 +0100, Paul Kölle wrote:
> Am 13.02.2010 10:50, schrieb Florian Ludwig:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking for a module/plugin/intra-process-communication/hook system
> > for python. Maybe someone here could point me to some project I missed
&
Hi,
I'm looking for a module/plugin/intra-process-communication/hook system
for python. Maybe someone here could point me to some project I missed
or might have some good ideas if I end up implementing it myself.
Most systems I have found are "one to many" communications but I would
like "many to
