Keith H Duggar wrote:
> It is a common refuge of those who cannot support their position with
> fact and logic. On more than one occasion Jon Harrop has all but
> crushed Ertugrul in this very forum with /source code/; that is as
> objective as it gets.
Since Jon has financial reasons to invest
"Jon Harrop" wrote:
> "Ertugrul Söylemez" wrote in message
> news:20101014052650.510e8...@tritium.streitmacht.eu...
>
> > That's nonsense.
>
> Actually namekuseijin is right. You really need to persevere and
> familiarize yourself with some of
namekuseijin wrote:
> On 14 out, 00:26, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
> > BTW, you mentioned symbols ('$', '.' and '>>='), which are not
> > syntactic sugar at all. They are just normal functions, for which
> > it makes sense to be infi
namekuseijin wrote:
> On 13 out, 21:01, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
> > What exactly is "friggin' huge" and "complex" about Haskell, and
> > what's this stuff about a "very own monolithic gcc"? Haskell isn't
> > a lot more comple
namekuseijin wrote:
> Take haskell and its so friggin' huge and complex that its got its
> very own scary monolithic gcc. When you think of it, Scheme is the
> one true high-level language with many quality perfomant backends --
> CL has a few scary compilers for native code, but not one to java
Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
> In Haskell the solution looks like this:
>
> [...]
And before anyone starts to rant, I didn't pay attention to where I'm
X-posting this stuff. Sorry for that. But on the other hand you could
say that I'm giving the Perl people (apparently the
Xah Lee wrote:
> here's a interesting toy list processing problem.
>
> I have a list of lists, where each sublist is labelled by a number. I
> need to collect together the contents of all sublists sharing the same
> label. So if I have the list
>
> ((0 a b) (1 c d) (2 e f) (3 g h) (1 i j) (2 k l)
Hello there Pythoners,
It was almost a week ago, when I got bored and thought, Python is quite
a boring language, so I'd need to do some evil functional programming
again. I thought, I'd share the result. ;)
This time, I added a Church style representation for lists [1] to
Python. The problem t
