On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:06 AM, wrote:
> ߒߤߒߡߜߦߡ ß ß§
And that's why you shouldn't let your kids play with your iPad :)
Dustin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks for the second round of responses. I think this gives me some
focus - concentrate on the API, talk to the framework developers, and
start redrafting the PEP sooner rather than later.
Thanks!
Dustin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The responses have certainly highlighted some errors in emphasis in my approach.
* My idea is to propose a design PEP. (Steven, Dennis) I'm not at
*all* suggesting including uthreads in the standard library. It's a
toy implementation I used to develop my ideas. I think of this as a
much smaller
After seeing David Mertz's talk at PyCon 2012, "Coroutines, event
loops, and the history of Python generators" [1], I got thinking again
about Python's expressive power for asynchronous programming.
Generators, particularly with the addition of 'yield from' and
'return' in PEP 380 [2], allow us to
This question was first brought up in October of 2005[1], and was included in
the "Unresolved Issues" section of my microthreading PEP, which I have quietly
withdrawn from consideration due to lack of community interest.
PEP 255 says
Q. Then why not allow an expression on "return" too?
A
Tommy Grav wrote:
> I have a small program that goes something like this
>
> def funcA() : pass
> def funcB() : pass
> def funcC() : pass
>
> def determine(f):
> t = f()
> return t
>
> What I would like to do is be able to
>
> n = determine(funcA)
> m = determine(funcB)
>
> But I can't really
I'm building an interface to Amazon's S3, using httplib. It uses a
single object for multiple transactions. What's happening is this:
HTTP > PUT /unitest-temp-1161039691 HTTP/1.1
HTTP > Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:01:32 GMT
HTTP > Authorization: AWS <>:KiTWRuq/6aay0bI2J5DkE2TAWD0=
HTTP > (end head
Lad wrote:
> Sorting seems to be OK,.
> the command
> print key,val
> prints the proper values
> but I can not create Newdict to be sorted properly.
>
> Where do I make a mistake?
> Thank you for help.
Dictionaries are unordered -- the order in which items come out is
unspecified. It's based on
