On 23 Feb 2007 07:31:35 -0800, "John Machin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Feb 23, 10:11 pm, David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
>
>I can make available the following which should be capable of running
>on 1.5.2 -- unless they've suffered bitrot
On 23 Feb 2007 19:13:10 +0100, Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2007-02-23, David C Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
>>
>> And/or does anyone see any problems with
>> the code below?
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> (Um: Believe it or not I'm _still_ using
On 23 Feb 2007 11:51:57 GMT, nmp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:45:54 +, schreef nmp:
>
>> Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:11:26 -0600, schreef David C. Ullrich:
>>
>>> Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
>>
>> Hey, cool! I am just beginning with Python but I may already be abl
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:43:24 + (UTC), Philipp Pagel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
>
>How about csv in the standard library?
>
>> (Um: Believe it or not I'm _still_ using
>> python 1.5.7.
>
>I have no idea if cs
Is there a csvlib out there somewhere?
And/or does anyone see any problems with
the code below?
What csvline does is straightforward: fields
is a list of strings. csvline(fields) returns
the strings concatenated into one string
separated by commas. Except that if a field
contains a comma or a dou
On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:25:23 -0700, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>David C. Ullrich wrote:
>
>> Good example, because we know that EMF is not dumb. I've seen
>> the same algorithm many times - the best example is ...
>
>Man, an error made _six years ago_ and people are still bringing
On Wed, 31 May 2006 23:05:14 +0200, Fredrik Lundh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Roger Miller wrote:
>
>> DSU seems like a lot of trouble to go through in order to use an O(n
>> log n) sorting algorithm to do what can be done in O(N) with a few
>> lines of code. The core code of random.shuffle() sho
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:17:11 +0200, Sybren Stuvel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David C Ullrich enlightened us with:
>> I thought that the fact that you could use the same trick for
>> _shuffling_ a list was my idea, gonna make me rich and famous. I
>> guess I'm not the only one who thought of it.
On 30 May 2006 21:53:32 -0700, "greenflame" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thank you all for all of your help. Also I got the shuffle function to
>work. Do not worry I will be back soon with more shuffling! However, I
>do not quite understand this DSU that you mention, although it looks
>useful.
I d
On 28 May 2006 01:07:16 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I'm working on a "TempFile" class that stores the data in memory until
>>> it gets larger than a specified threshold (as per PEP 42). Whilst
>>> trying to implement it, I've come across some strange behaviour. Can
>>> anyone explain thi
On Fri, 05 May 2006 07:44:45 -0500, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>Just curious: How does pythonxx.dll determine things
>like where to find the standard library? That's the
>sort of thing I'd feared might cause confusion...
Ok, it was a stupid question, cuz right there in the
r
On Tue, 09 May 2006 05:35:47 -0500, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:46:57 -0400, Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>[...]
>
>If you, um, look at the code you see that "cells.a = 42" triggers
>cells.__setattr__, which fires a's callback; the callback then
>r
On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:46:57 -0400, Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>David C. Ullrich wrote:
>> On 08 May 2006 12:53:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas
>> F. Burdick) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>
No, you do not want on-change handlers propagating
On 08 May 2006 12:53:09 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas
F. Burdick) wrote:
>Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> No, you do not want on-change handlers propagating data to other
>> slots, though that is a sound albeit primitive way of improving
>> self-consistency of data in big apps. The
On Mon, 08 May 2006 08:05:38 -0500, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>
>def acall(cell, value):
> cell.owner.slots['b'].value = value + 1
Needing to say that sort of thing every time
you define a callback isn't very nice.
New and improved version:
"""PyCells.py"""
class Cell:
On Sun, 07 May 2006 10:36:00 -0400, Ken Tilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>[...]
>
>Your spreadsheet does not have slots ruled by functions, it has one slot
>for a dictionary where you store names and values/formulas.
>
>Go back to your example and arrange it so a and b are actual slots (data
>m
On Thu, 4 May 2006 13:19:46 -0400, "Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>[David C.Ullrich]
>> Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
>> variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
>> versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on one Windows
On Thu, 4 May 2006 16:17:57 +0200, "Fredrik Lundh"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David C.Ullrich wrote:
>
>> Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
>> variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
>> versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on
Would there be issues (registry settings, environment
variables, whatever) if a person tried to install
versions 1.x and 2.x simultaneously on one Windows
system? Windows 98, if it matters.
(I can handle the file associations with no problem.)
Thanks.
**
If anyone feels
19 matches
Mail list logo
