ently defined command processor. And
> one could ensure this by just quoting the first word on the line
Useful.
However, I know Python, never looked at Rexx, so not much use to me.
Tks
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28 June 2010 18:39, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 06/28/2010 05:48 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>> Main queries are: Ease of calling out to bash to use something like
>> imageMagick or Java? Ease of grabbing return parameters? E.g. convert
>> can return both height and width of
ugh.
>
> What you want is the output of the program. For this you need to
> capture the output and parse it.
>
> Look at the subprocess module.
Will do.
tks D'Arcy (and Benjamin)
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
eturned to the Python program?
Can Python access the exit status of a program?
I'd prefer the advantages of using Python, just wondering if I got
so far with the port then found it wouldn't do something?
Has anyone made this comparison please?
TIA
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FA