Harlin Seritt wrote:
I have three tuples of the same size: tup1, tup2, tup3
I'd like to do something like this:
for a,b,c in tup1, tup2, tup3:
print a
print b
print c
Of course, you get an error when you try to run the pseudocode above.
What is the correct way to get this done?
For somethi
Daniel Cer wrote:
Robert wrote:
I have a command line app that can take up to 20 minutes to complete and
every minute or so updates it's status (spits it out to console). I am
writing a front end for this app in python/gtk and was wondering what
command I use to a) invoke the command and b
Robert wrote:
I have a command line app that can take up to 20 minutes to complete and
every minute or so updates it's status (spits it out to console). I am
writing a front end for this app in python/gtk and was wondering what
command I use to a) invoke the command and b) how to capture it's out
string
thread.start_new_thread(inputLoop, () )
time.sleep(3)
print "\nTime's up exiting...."
win32api.TerminateProcess(-1, 0)
-Dan
Daniel Cer wrote:
For what it's worth, this looks like a Windows specific problem.
The code below seems to work as expected on a Linux box. That is,
everythin
For what it's worth, this looks like a Windows specific problem.
The code below seems to work as expected on a Linux box. That is,
everything terminates, including the "inputLoop", after sys.exit() is
called, without the user needing to press 'enter' one last time.
However, if I try to run the c
> > Why not just inherit from dict? That seems to work.
>
> Because that isn't the question - Steven knows how to make it work, what he's
> curious about is why things are the way they are :)
Sorry, didn't mean to be a pest :)
I guess I assumed Steve already knew that he could inherit from dict.
Why not just inherit from dict? That seems to work.
>>> class M(dict):
... def __getitem__(self,key):
... return 42
... def __setitem__(self,key,value):
... pass
...
>>> class C(object):
...pass
...
>>> c = C()
>>> c.__dict__ = M()
>>> c.__dict__['x']
42
-Dan
Steven Bethard wrote:
I
