>
> There is no point of nested classes because nested classes _are not_
> supported by python. They are simply an artifact of not actively
> denying the syntax non-globally. I would fully support a change to the
> language to actively forbid a class definition that is not
> module-level.
>
> > I
> Defining it as a nested class saves you one line
> of code, but IMHO makes the result just a bit more cluttered, while
> reducing the elegance of reusing the metaclass.
The whole point of nested class is to avoid polluting the namespace with
classes that are only used locally. So the argument a
> This is a language limitation.
> This is because nested scope is implemented for python function only since
> 2.3
> allow late binding of free variables. the scope in class statment is not a
> closure, so there is only two possible scope in it : local and global.
That was my understanding as wel
Hi,
I'd like to be able to use a nested class (C1) from another sibling nested
class (C3). This looks very similar to the nested scopes of functions except
that it does not work.
class A(object):
pass
class B(object):
class C1(object):
pass
cla
