ase the disk is dying.
>
I am now trying o install the binary version, 64 bit, of Python 3.4.4 from
Python.org. I get the message:
Python 3.4.4 (64 bit)
There is a problem with the Windows [10] Installer Package. A program
required for this install to complete could not be run
On 17-Jan-10 18:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 11:13:48 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
In article,
"Colin W." wrote:
On 17-Jan-10 02:16 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/17/2010 1:55 AM, Brendan Miller wrote:
Is there any difference whatsoever between a raw string
On 17-Jan-10 02:16 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/17/2010 1:55 AM, Brendan Miller wrote:
Is there any difference whatsoever between a raw string beginning with
the captical R or one with the lower case r e.g. r"string" vs
R"string"?
No. Nor is there and difference between the strings created with
On 18-Dec-09 23:16 PM, Nobody wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:49:26 -0500, Colin W. wrote:
You don't say, but seem to imply that the slice components include None.
That's how missing components are implemented at the language level:
> class foo:
= def __geti
licing now selects all items with index k such that i <= k < j where i
and j are the specified lower and upper bounds. This may be an empty
sequence. It is not an error if i or j lie outside the range of valid
indexes (such items don’t exist so they aren’t selected).
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
licing now selects all items with index k such that i <= k < j where i
and j are the specified lower and upper bounds. This may be an empty
sequence. It is not an error if i or j lie outside the range of valid
indexes (such items don’t exist so they aren’t selected).
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
that they're actually the same thing. Then
the same notation could be used for both purposes.
This would be good if the increment could also be handled.
Terry Reedy suggested:- for i in [1:n]: ...
Are the brackets really needed?
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
slice() function.
If your scheme flies, would it be practicable to use the same syntax
as a range generator?
range(i, j, k) => i:j:k
so range(10, 2) => :10:2
i.e. we could write for i in :10:2:
or the more common:
range(10) => :10
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
them.
Google: unit conversion python
you'll have lots of offers.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You'll have some answers here:
http://jessenoller.com/2009/12/04/pythons-moratorium-lets-think-about-this/
2.7 is now available.
Work is going on numpy with Python 3.0
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
g/reference/expressions.html#summary
Parentheses permit the user to vary the precedence.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
td
Right
...you get this:
...
[snip]
This is a neat idea but would a two character indentation not be enough?
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
tical functions known to
the module FirstDerivatives".
What is a good solution or workaround to this problem which appears to
be quite a standard situation to me?
Thanks for any help, harold.
You might consider using numpy.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
a regular module and not the package, it
wouldn't find module/part1.py .
Doesn't it make sense to avoid the use of names like module or package,
even though they are permitted.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
reads the messages.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
15 matches
Mail list logo