rusi said:
> And let me suggest that you follow your own advise -- Can you say what
> you have to say in 1/10th the number of words? Ok if not 1/10th then
> 1/5th? 1-third?
Thanks for the suggestion. I apologize for being that expansive; maybe you
are right about this. In my world less use to be
On May 16, 5:55 am, Citizen Kant wrote:
> As a matter of
> class, the word python names first a python snake than a Monty Python,
> which is 50% inspired by that python word, word that's been being
> considered the given name of a particular kind of snake since times in
>
On 2013-05-14, Citizen Kant wrote:
> 2013/5/14 Steven D'Aprano
>
>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 01:32:43 +0200, Citizen Kant wrote:
>>
>> >> An entity named Python must be somehow as a serpent. Don't forget that
>> >> I'm with the freeing up of
Case study (kind of)
Imagine that I use to explore with my mind a particular topic and I want to
map and model the mechanics of that exploration. That's mostly
metaphysical. I have a partner called Python with whom I must communicate
in Python. Which would be the basics that I must "know" in order
>>From: llanitedave
>>On Monday, May 13, 2013 4:32:43 PM UTC-7, Citizen Kant wrote:
>>>An entity named Python must be
>>> somehow as a serpent.
llanitedave wrote:
>>>> Moe like a dead parrot, actually.
That's a good one! Even If doesn'
2013/5/14 Steven D'Aprano
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 01:32:43 +0200, Citizen Kant wrote:
>
> >> An entity named Python must be somehow as a serpent. Don't forget that
> >> I'm with the freeing up of my memory, now I'm not trying to follow the
> >&g
hat could be called perimeter or edge or
boundary, and even if all of those labels denote a limit, all of them,
unless for me, sound like... static. To think about Python in terms of
something that's static seems incorrect. "Axiomatic parameters" looked like
an initial limit that one can s
ot;interact"
with it. Python could be considered like a solitary game, and in my opinion
could be taken as it is from the beginning, in order to properly understand
what one exactly is doing. That seems to be the best way to properly
"understand" Python; then knowledge will com
Hi,
this could be seen as an extravagant subject but that is not my original
purpose. I still don't know if I want to become a programmer or not. At
this moment I'm just inspecting the environment. I'm making my way to
Python (and OOP in general) from a philosophical perspective or point of
view an
